I think your reply was immature. He was probably just writing something he knew little about and did a minimal amount of research.

The only problem with his logic in the part that I read about players unable to win is that he thinks the rake is higher than it is per hand. He says: "Let's say 200 hands are played which does not take that long. After 200 hands, that 50 cents rake per hand totals $100 which is the entire amount that all of the players started with at the website table." That would be a 5% rake assuming everyone shoved all-in preflop for $20 each hand and the rake was uncapped, etc.