No
Hell naw
He already tapped it when she was a thin super duper model
That's him in the background showing the bros proper curl form
|
05-22-2011 08:06 PM
#1
| |
![]()
|
|
|
05-22-2011 08:30 PM
#2
| |
Probably not, but that's more plump chick for me. | |
|
| |
|
05-22-2011 08:33 PM
#3
| |
^^ | |
|
05-23-2011 12:04 AM
#4
| |
I'm with team Pleasantly Plump. | |
|
05-23-2011 12:22 AM
#5
| |
I'm with Boost. | |
| |
|
05-23-2011 01:22 AM
#6
| |
I'm with boog | |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 01:26 AM
#7
| |
I'm with flomo | |
|
05-23-2011 02:15 AM
#8
| |
sidenote: despite not being massive, there is something very Stay Puft about her. Photographer just prob caught her in a strange pose. | |
|
05-23-2011 02:40 AM
#9
| |
woah those things want out | |
|
05-23-2011 03:05 AM
#10
| |
She's a fucking minger! Even pissed I'd turn that fat Bitch down. Wtf is wrong with you people? Are you that hard up? | |
| |
|
05-23-2011 03:12 AM
#11
| |
![]()
|
It's the muscle beneath it all. Very important stuff for sexuality of physiques, and it makes somebody who is fat appear less fat. Put her fat on a girl who doesn't wear much muscle and she'd look awful, but a good chubby physique is often predicated on muscle. The neat plump vs sloppy plump is a good distinction. You could say a good plump appears more "full", which if you think about it, is a usually sought after sexual characteristic |
|
05-23-2011 03:17 AM
#12
| |
![]()
| |
|
05-23-2011 07:22 AM
#13
| |
| |
|
05-23-2011 07:26 AM
#14
| |
I wouldn't hit it with wufwugy's dick on a 10 foot pole. | |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 09:56 AM
#15
| |
she appears to be a genetically normal female, which already puts her at a 10/10 by 'would hit?' standards. | |
|
05-23-2011 12:18 PM
#16
| |
|
05-23-2011 12:26 PM
#17
| |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 12:47 PM
#18
| |
| |
|
05-23-2011 12:54 PM
#19
| |
![]()
|
I'll say it again and again and again. Womanly figures are hot, six packs are not. The girl I've been getting with recently is a girl who used to be seriously slim, but has recently put on a bit of weight in all the right places, and it just makes her look so fucking hot. |
|
05-23-2011 01:45 PM
#20
| |
I agree womanly figures are hot. I'm just not sure how fat/borderline-obese became 'womanly'. The female in the OP would be far more attractive if she lost 15 pounds of fat (in my opinion) and would be healthier as well (absolutely no doubt about this). | |
|
05-23-2011 01:50 PM
#21
| |
note: I'm not saying girl in OP is obese, just talking in general there | |
|
05-23-2011 01:58 PM
#22
| |
![]()
|
She's probably just bulking and is about to cut. |
|
05-23-2011 02:06 PM
#23
| |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 05:17 PM
#24
| |
![]()
|
So far everybody in this thread has been right, except for Dana Rong, curiously |
|
05-23-2011 05:34 PM
#25
| |
ya, chubby porn is dicey... it sucks cuz theres probably a big market for it, but "obese porn" isn't very aesthetically pleasing to the ear, so obese chicks in porn are intentionally mislabeled, chubby, thick, plump. | |
|
05-23-2011 05:43 PM
#26
| |
I wouldn't beat it to chubby porn with wufwugy's dick on a 10-foot pole. | |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 05:48 PM
#27
| |
|
05-23-2011 05:49 PM
#28
| |
li...link? | |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 05:50 PM
#29
| |
![]()
|
If you have fake tits you need to keep yourself at a not low bodyfat. All fake tits are mega fake without fat to mold and naturalize the physique |
|
05-23-2011 05:57 PM
#30
| |
It's actually pretty interesting to have a pic of a girl in a thread who isn't totally hot or totally disgusting but somewhere in the middle, for some debate. | |
|
05-23-2011 06:00 PM
#31
| |
![]()
|
Good luck finding ass or legs even close to as nice as this in non-chubby porn. That chick is not even chubby in the slightest too. Thinner than your average American, but fatter than the pencil abominations of regular porn |
|
05-23-2011 06:01 PM
#32
| |
| |
|
05-23-2011 06:17 PM
#33
| |
![]()
| |
|
05-23-2011 06:23 PM
#34
| |
![]()
|
Not the prettiest face in the world, but if you're looking for excellence in one area, you usually have to sacrifice some in other areas |
|
05-23-2011 06:32 PM
#35
| |
|
| |
|
05-23-2011 08:10 PM
#36
| |
On the whole that body shape is fine by me, but it really looks like she's waddling which is strange because she doesn't seem so big she needs to. So either she's bigger than it first seems, or its a really bad shot or something. | |
Last edited by bjsaust; 05-23-2011 at 08:13 PM.
| |
|
05-23-2011 08:12 PM
#37
| |
![]()
|
Homey she aint waddling. If she was, based on that photo, her gait would be like a 400 pound woman or some shit |
|
05-23-2011 08:13 PM
#38
| |
Dunno, maybe its the way she's holding her arms out to the side, like she needs balance or something. | |
| |
|
05-23-2011 09:45 PM
#39
| |
Pretty much this-- if there is any place where 'too skinny for their own good' is common it's probably the fashion industry. Then again I don't pay attention to it a whole lot, so I'm going on some preconceived notions here. | |
|
05-24-2011 04:38 AM
#40
| |
I'm not wrong. It's a matter of taste. If I haven't got laid in 6 months then sure I'd hit it. But I've always been good at getting hotish girls. I do not find het attractive. I mean Jesus fucking Christ look at her thighs! My fav part of a girls body are butt thighs and tummy. I couldn't get wood looking at this girls thighs, I'd have to think of something else. She's a troll. If I saw her in a bar I wouldn't look twice. Just see the thighs, look away and hope she doesn't try and speak to me. | |
| |
|
05-24-2011 04:50 AM
#41
| |
If it comes without me having to do the effort of seducing her then sure, otherwise hm maybe. | |
|
| |
|
05-24-2011 02:27 PM
#42
| |
|
05-24-2011 02:34 PM
#43
| |
Is she nice? | |
|
05-25-2011 06:31 AM
#44
| |
| |