fwiw guys dont take any of the two articles claims as gospel. this type of thing needs a bunch of research, and it hasnt yet had it. a huge problem with studying consumption is the amount of variables are off the chart, cheating is almost always present, and its ridiculously hard and even impossible to control some variables.

i havent looked at the testicular cancer marijuana links (and i bet its likely dubius), but wrt the lung cancer marijuana links the scientific community has claimed nothing but 'we need more research to say anything other than possibilities'

an example can be that vitamin d has gotten tons more research done with it than marijuana, yet the most recent vitamin d research is producing a slew of new information. we just cannot take one or a couple studies exclusively when it comes to consumption