|
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
I want to know more about this.
My references to taxation are not about any specific tax code, but about collective social and economic activity that creates different levels of effective taxation on different classes. Even without an explicit tax collection criteria (which is still unheard of in any large society) it's about power distribution and how that itself effects into economic taxation.
Policy that effects into regressive taxation consolidates power into the special, policy that effects into progressive taxation redistributes power into the general. The effects are also strongly perpetual until a massive jolt like rebellion from the general (like what happened back in 1776) or trickery from the special (like modern corporatism). When power pushes towards consolidation into the special, things like human rights and free market and all that go by the wayside due to the general being born into powerless enough positions. When power pushes towards redistribution into the general, that trend reverses, and the gap between lucky/unlucky tightens.
When it boils down to it, the reason real taxation on what people "earn" is paramount is because the deservedness "system" is imbalanced, and if we don't artificially push power towards those who don't "deserve" it, we've inadvertently created an oligarchy where the vast majority of people born into the society do so with less rights and opportunity than average
|