|
Yes total winnings is better than winrate before a point at least. With pure winrate we'll see nothing but fish who ran good for 8 hands or whatever. Is there some way you can include the number of hands played for each person?
Overall, what's important in this game is hourly, not winrate, so that does make total winnings premium, but it still won't show the total of which players are the best since some of us don't play much yet may play very well when we do.
Another thing I think would be awesome is showing results of every player who played 25k+ hands/month. As far as showing who're the most skilled I think this would be the most comprehensive way.
And I don't mean to clown on your shit ISF. You're doing great.
|