I'm not trying to dismiss your point that some poor individuals wouldn't get kidneys without rationing. It is a technically accurate point. However, I think, while being technically accurate when applied to individuals, it causes more harm for the group. When we speak of the poor in aggregate, a kidney market helps them way more than no kidney market. But we still could find a small number of people in that group who wouldn't get kidneys without rationing. The problem is this sort of thing is like burning a dollar to give somebody a nickel when not burning a dollar would have given two other people a quarter each