***Official TV sitcoms and Series recommendation thread***

[BooG690]

******************* POSSIBLE SOPRANOS SPOILERS ****************************

I'm really not sure how DanArong or anyone else is arguing that some blog post about the ending gives the "definitive" answer. Chase has said nothing about the ending. Therefore, we don't know. It's still the Pulp Fiction suit case.

[Galapogos]

******************* POSSIBLE SOPRANOS SPOILERS ****************************

I'm really not sure how DanArong or anyone else is arguing that some blog post about the ending gives the "definitive" answer. Chase has said nothing about the ending. Therefore, we don't know. It's still the Pulp Fiction suit case.

******************* MORE POSSIBLE SOPRANOS SPOILERS ****************************

Chase simply hasn't answered the ending for people. But he basically confirmed that the ending isn't ambiguous. He said everything is in the episodes of the last season for you to figure out what happened. Meaning, he had what Tony's fate actually was in mind when he created the finale.

There's also this amazing blog post Ken Jennings wrote a few years ago about the ending that brings up wayyyyyyyy more stuff I never noticed and more stuff than the previously linked blog post brought up. It was a really good read. But he has taken it down since then because he didn't like all the attention it was getting. It was up for a few years though so I'm sure it can be found with some site caching engine.

Also, the stuff people see in Sopranos just blows me away a lot of the time. I never realized what a surface viewer I was with tv shows, until people started writing about all the deeper hidden messages in shows like Sopranos.

[rong]

******************* POSSIBLE SOPRANOS SPOILERS ****************************

I'm really not sure how DanArong or anyone else is arguing that some blog post about the ending gives the "definitive" answer. Chase has said nothing about the ending. Therefore, we don't know. It's still the Pulp Fiction suit case.

Gala pretty much answered this one, but the key difference is the suitcase contents were designed to be unknown and are actually irrelevant. All that matters is that the contents are some impressive shit that Marcellus Wallace wants. Quentin Tarantino said he orinally planned on showing diamonds in it, but then decided not seeing the contents made it more interesting for the viewer.

The last episode of Sopranos may have been a little subtle, but the obvious interprertation becomes more obvious the more you dig and as Gala said, Chase stated that everything is there to figure it out and he was trying to convey a particular outcome so imo any alternative interpretation is clearly just kidding yourself. But then again, I guess subtle is ambiguous for the thick, and a lot of people are pretty thick.