Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 2871

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    oskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,019
    Location
    in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
    Last edited by oskar; 09-07-2018 at 04:31 AM.
    The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
  2. #2
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by oskar View Post
    What are we supposed to be seeing there?

    She asks him a question that could be hard to answer and he dithers over the answer, the end.
  3. #3
    oskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,019
    Location
    in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    What are we supposed to be seeing there?

    She asks him a question that could be hard to answer and he dithers over the answer, the end.
    It's an extremely specific yes or no question. If I asked you: did you talk about abortion with your mother at Disney Land, your reply wouldn't be: I'm not sure what you mean by "mother." The reason he doesn't answer is because if he answers truthfully it's more bad press for Trump, and if he lies and they have evidence to the contrary, he's lying in front of congress which is kinda bad optics for a supreme court justice.
    Kavernauth is there to keep Mueller away from Trump. He's bought and paid for.
    Last edited by oskar; 09-07-2018 at 10:08 AM.
    The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
  4. #4
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    I don't even see the problem with asking, "do you still think it's illegal to investigate a sitting president?" Asking a potential nominee many questions regarding their various stances is his (the President's) responsibility.

    I don't buy the "impartial human" assertion. No human is impartial. Good judges strive to be impartial, but they still bring their own sense of what is best to every decision.
    Of course, it'd be great to have perfectly impartial judges, but I don't see that as a practical reality.
    Last edited by MadMojoMonkey; 09-07-2018 at 10:26 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •