|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
What, pointing out your hypocrisy? You cry sexism while promoting sexism. You cry racism while promoting racism. No, sorry, I won't give it up. Instead you should try to understand why your comments come across as hypocritical.
Only because you assume I'm a feminist (which I'm not). And I don't know what you're talking about racism for, sorry.
Originally Posted by OngBonga
I wouldn't, but I don't live in a country where the guy who just shoved me to the ground might have a gun.
Get the fuck out. As if being shoved to the ground and then standing there in America is a threat to your life, like it's such a big cultural divide that it means something different there than here. Try being less of a disingenuous retard sometimes.
Originally Posted by OngBonga
I get banana's point that brandishing a gun should not be done simply for the sake of brandishing it. However, this doesn't mean that once a gun is brandished, it has to be fired. That said, the decision to fire may well have been made at exactly the same time as the decision to brandish. That I think is reckless, but is it illegal? I don't know.
It's not illegal if he thinks his life is in danger. That's the whole point of the discussion about why SYG is such a retarded law. Maybe if you paid attention to what the debate was about instead of trying to troll everyone by picking apart some tangential comments they make you'd learn something.
|
Reply With Quote