*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[BananaStand]

It only got into the question of anti-nepotism later on,

Right, AFTER the "Ivanka replaces Rex" argument turned out to be a steaming wet bucket of shit.

as per my assertion that that is a relatively minor part of my argument.

it WAS a relatively minor part of your argument. Then the juvenile, poorly researched, glib, and moronic argument of "Ivanka replaces Rex" got exposed for the biased liberal propaganda that it is.

Now nepotism is your ENTIRE argument.

[Poopadoop]

Now nepotism is your ENTIRE argument.

I guess you need to read this again:

The argument is that Jarvanka shouldn't be involved in government because a) they're not qualified; and b) there's conflicts of interest.

Whether you find nepotism in and of itself problematic doesn't change a) or b) above; in fact it's the least important part of the whole argument.

Edit: please answer me before banana does so I can have an intelligent conversation about it.

Also maybe take the hint this time and let someone else respond.

[Poopadoop]

maybe take the hint this time and let someone else respond.

.

[BananaStand]

Also maybe take the hint this time and let someone else respond.

Tired of getting curb stomped?