|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
The nepotism law in government is not ignored, except implicitly by Trump. He's not even breaking it because Jarvanka aren't on any official payroll or working in any official capacity.
So what the rest of your post had to do with anything is beyond me.
We can call that 'non sequitur ad Mojo' if you like.
I answered a direct question of yours, so if there's a non sequitur at play it's the question you posed.
If you're now saying it was off topic, then I agree.
If this point can be ruled out as supporting your greater argument, then what new information do you have to motivate that position?
***
I agree with your first point. The entire conversation about nepotism is a non sequitur as of now. If Trump actually breaks an anti-nepotism law, then the conversation becomes relevant. As of now, it's another witch hunt.
|
Reply With Quote