*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[Poopadoop]

Finally you're starting to get it. Every single piece of (weak) evidence used to suggest a Trump-Russia connection can be sourced back to Hillary. EVERY SINGLE ONE!

You mean it was Hillary who sent that email from Don Jr. to the Russians?

Also, Hillary hired those shady people with links to Russia for Trump's campaign like Manafort and Page?

And Hillary fired Comey too?

HOLY FUCK MAN!!!!!! Why isn't this all over the newspapers?

Oh wait, I know. 'cause they're biased! Goddamn it, we're being misled so badly by this blatant reporting of objective facts!

In the real world, evidence coming from biased sources should be viewed with more skepticism than evidence coming from objective sources.

As it is. The problem is there's just so much of it, it's hard to explain it all away as being all fabricated, as much as some people might try to.

[BananaStand]

You mean it was Hillary who sent that email from Don Jr. to the Russians?

Not a crime.

Also, Hillary hired those shady people with links to Russia for Trump's campaign like Manafort and Page?

What's shady about Page? Also, he wasn't hired.

Manafort's shady-ness pre-dated his work for Trump, had nothing to do with his work for Trump, and wasn't exposed until after his work for Trump. As far as we know, Trump hired a guy who was good at politics who also worked for some Russians in the past. That is HARDLY a reason to suspect wrong-doing.

It's only because of Hillary-sourced lies that the R-word conjures up suspicion.

And Hillary fired Comey too?

How is this evidence of a Trump-russia connection? As far as the facts tell us, it's evidence of Comey doing a bad job.

HOLY FUCK MAN!!!!!! Why isn't this all over the newspapers? Oh wait, I know. 'cause they're biased!

The sad part is you aren't exaggerating very much here.

[BananaStand]

As it is.

No it isn't. Not when the bias behind the evidence is deliberately obfuscated.