|
|
 Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
Now, care to back this up with actual facts? Non-anecdotal? Non-masturbatory pieces where the writers don't have to scramble to justify whatever narrative they have to rep and/or sell? You know, other than "Teddy said it" or "Vinny said it"?
Implicit from your stance is that when a person has a measure of a motive to slaughter, threatening his ability to slaughter doesn't affect the measure of the motive. I (and most people) do not find that logical or credible. Do you find that logical and credible?
|
Reply With Quote