|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
But then I was like: compromising an account assumed to be the voice of the President could actually be an enormous disaster.
slowclap.gif
See Wuf? You *ARE* completely capable of reasonable thought. 
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
And now I'm like: it's easily as important to make sure that Trump's device is as secure as it was for Crooked's devices. Too bad the left blew all its capital to hold him accountable by screaming nonsense at the top of its lungs.
"Crooked" wasn't POTUS at the time. Plus, a server has better security (you know, people manage such servers) than a run-of-the-mill android phone. Have you heard the news about the amount of Twitter-specific hacks that happened last year?
"OurMine" are notorious for this. If a bunch of script kiddies can, how about state sponsored actors?
[TECH_RANT]
For starters, Twitter's 2FA is particularly shitty, as they only use phone number auth. It's shit. It's 2010's, and as we know, in the tech industry a year is more like a millenia. There are so many vectors of attack for this I'm not even kidding. Godspeed.
[/TECH_RANT]
|