|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Now nepotism is your ENTIRE argument.
I guess you need to read this again:
The argument is that Jarvanka shouldn't be involved in government because a) they're not qualified; and b) there's conflicts of interest.
Whether you find nepotism in and of itself problematic doesn't change a) or b) above; in fact it's the least important part of the whole argument.
Edit: please answer me before banana does so I can have an intelligent conversation about it.
Also maybe take the hint this time and let someone else respond.
|
Reply With Quote