No. This is your binary way of seeing things.Well, you've been trying to blame NATO since this thing started. Granted, at least you're aware enough to realise the country that is the aggressor deserves most of the blame, but still...
I've been assigning blame to both Russia and NATO.
Potentially being the key word. I never stopped believing 9/11 was an inside job of some sort. There are no limits to what people will do to preserve power. If they're not throwing nukes about, it's because nobody wants a nuclear wasteland as a prize for winning a war.So anything bad that happens in Ukraine is potentially a NATO covert op to use as "leverage." Leverage to do what?
The link I posted above was a livestream of the security camera, but I didn't see it start, I tuned in after hostilities had ceased. It's no longer a live stream, and is up as evidence of the attack.Citation for bolded? Have you seen footage of the fire starting that resulted from something other than shelling?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYUT36YGOh8
See comments for a timeline of events.
The fire appears to have started after a tank fired at the building. From the pov of this camera, the reactors appear to be behind the action, the focus of the attack is presumably where the power plant security are based.
It's not a false flag. It's a straight up capture of a nuclear power plant. It doesn't look like the reactors were ever in danger of being hit, but it's still shit the bed action.
But NATO are certainly capable of false flag events. I really don't know if they are itching for an excuse or not. I just don't trust NATO any more than I trust Putin. That might look to you like I'm looking to blame NATO, or taking Putin's side, but that's once again a binary way of looking at it.
Originally Posted by wufwugy
Reply With Quote
