|
|
 Originally Posted by poop
If the UK went to war with Australia because there's a majority of English-speaking people there, and one of their provinces for some reason wanted to be a part of the UK, would that be ok?
This isn't remotely analogous. This isn't a regional matter any more, you couldn't have picked two places on Earth further apart.
You'd have been better off talking about the Falklands. These people actually do want to be part of the UK, for good reason... they fear the Argentinians. Morally, the Falklands should be an independent nation, free from UK rule, but I can totally understand why they want the protection that comes from the British military. Maybe their fear of Argentina is somewhat irrational, this isn't the Junta days of the 80s anymore, but their occasional nationalist rhetoric regarding the Falklands really doesn't help.
This Ukraine conflict is a whole different matter though. Donbas borders Russia. It was part of the Soviet Union in living memory. The people of this region, for the most part, share more in common with Russia than Ukraine. Of course there's a lot more to it than that, but when you have these cultural and ethnic issues at borders, you've got complicated problems.
Ukraine saying "nope this is Ukrainian territory, fuck off" is no different to the UK saying to Ireland "nope this is British territory, fuck off". You can't just sweep these kind of things under the carpet by simply declaring sovereignty.
Ultimately, democracy should prevail. But if democracy prevails here, Donetsk and the surrounding region becomes autonomous and politically closer to Russia than Ukraine.
|