|
|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Oops.
Oh I missed that 'cause I heard a review on the reason the case was ruled the way it was.
Got all excited to say smart things I heard someone else say.
My bad.
Yeah poop is right, it's the "three black men" comment. It could just be terrible journalism, or it could be a malicious attempt to stoke racial tensions.
The case was ruled as it was because he didn't break the law. Like you say, if that's a problem, then the law is broken. For me, it's purely a guns vs no guns issue. If guns are legal, then lethal force self defence must be legal too. You can't have an armed population and then say to the people you can't defend yourself if you think you're in very serious danger.
|
Reply With Quote