Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    But bear in mind that the level of actual fraud claims that have been made and pressed by lawyers are stupid.

    One was a charge that when vote-counters were counting Trump votes, they rolled their eyes. Not remotely a crime.

    One was that a vote counter (not polling agent) made a joke that was derisive of Trump. Also not a crime.

    One was that a specific representative of the Trump campaign wasn't allowed to be an "observer in the room" and the judge simply asked, "Was there a representative of the Trump campaign in the room?" The lawyer said, "Yeah." and the judge was like, "You're not entitled to pick who is in the room. If your side was represented, and you're not arguing that representative was compromised in any way, then this case is dismissed."
    (Obv. paraphrasing)

    One was about a 3rd-hand account that someone saw a box of votes that they didn't know whether or not had been counted start being counted. The judge asked, "How is this not hearsay." and the lawyer replied some nonsense, and the judge asked again, and reminded him he was in a court of law, and he said it is hearsay. The judge asked if he had any direct evidence of fraud and he said no.


    These are the level of cases being brought to court. Nothing even suggesting widespread fraud in the specific instances claimed, let alone a state-wide or nation-wide effort.

    An effort at the state or nation scale would require thousands of conspirators in on the act. What's that "law" about the more people in on a secret the shorter the time it takes for the secret to be revealed?

    There were people with cell phone cameras at every polling and vote counting place in the US and there's no flood of hundreds or thousands of videos showing obvious wrong-doing.


    At a certain point it IS the moon landing level of conspiracy. So many people had to be in on it. So many with good reasons to call BS had to keep quiet. At a certain point it's just about the scale. This is tiny, but the claims are huge. It doesn't add up.
    Normalize Inter-Community Sense-Making
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    But bear in mind that the level of actual fraud claims that have been made and pressed by lawyers are stupid.

    One was a charge that when vote-counters were counting Trump votes, they rolled their eyes. Not remotely a crime.

    One was that a vote counter (not polling agent) made a joke that was derisive of Trump. Also not a crime.

    One was that a specific representative of the Trump campaign wasn't allowed to be an "observer in the room" and the judge simply asked, "Was there a representative of the Trump campaign in the room?" The lawyer said, "Yeah." and the judge was like, "You're not entitled to pick who is in the room. If your side was represented, and you're not arguing that representative was compromised in any way, then this case is dismissed."
    (Obv. paraphrasing)

    One was about a 3rd-hand account that someone saw a box of votes that they didn't know whether or not had been counted start being counted. The judge asked, "How is this not hearsay." and the lawyer replied some nonsense, and the judge asked again, and reminded him he was in a court of law, and he said it is hearsay. The judge asked if he had any direct evidence of fraud and he said no.


    These are the level of cases being brought to court. Nothing even suggesting widespread fraud in the specific instances claimed, let alone a state-wide or nation-wide effort.

    An effort at the state or nation scale would require thousands of conspirators in on the act. What's that "law" about the more people in on a secret the shorter the time it takes for the secret to be revealed?

    There were people with cell phone cameras at every polling and vote counting place in the US and there's no flood of hundreds or thousands of videos showing obvious wrong-doing.


    Most of which we already explained to Ong but apparently the facts are biased too just like we are.

    If large numbers of vote counters start ending up dead in "accidents" I'll sit up and take notice. But the cases they've brought to court have all just been lolbad, like firing a shitgun at a wall and hoping something sticks.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •