Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
No the difference is that I recognize when the evidence is strong and leans towards a certain conclusion, and you grasp for any excuse to dismiiss the evidence. And when each excuse you present gets shot down, you come up with another.
Ok so we disagree on what "strong evidence" is. Because I haven't seen any yet.

I think you're reading that wrong. 1.1x means 110% more, not 10% more.
I'm trying my hardest to understand why you would think this. It seems completely illogical to assume this.

This means that, across London, black people were subject to an account at 1.1 times the rate of whites
This is the exact wording. I'm pretty sure you're wrong to say this represents 110% rather than 10%. If 100 whites get pulled, 110 blacks get pulled. That's 1.1x the rate.

^^ Gives a race-based explanation that he claims isn't racism.
Once again, you knee jerk into racism. It was a speculative suggestion, but it could be accurate. There could be a cultural problem with how black people interact with police compared to white people. I don't know this, but if it's true, it's not the police's fault, so it's not police racism.