IDK. Everything I know about impeachment, I've basically learned in the past few weeks through repeated google searches.

The start of the impeachment trial involves the entire Senate taking an oath, which includes being impartial in the trial.
If Senate leaders can go on the record saying they will not follow their oath to be impartial in the impeachment trial, then what even matters?
They've basically said, "We can't find the President corrupt, because we're corrupt. QED."

With all the open lies and misdirection working like a charm, why not Ken Starr?

I mean, how is Giuliani remotely credible as anything but a shyster?

Typical transcript of a Giuliani interview:
Reporter: Did you do [it]?
Rudy: No. How could you accuse me of that?
Reporter: So what did you do?
Rudy: I did [It].
Reporter: So you did [it]?
Rudy: No. How could you accuse me of that?


I've seen it multiple times. How is he not publicly discredited?
If Trump's supporters will accept Giuliani, why not Starr?