lol.

The whistleblower is hearsay.

I got news for you... the actual recording of the phone call is also hearsay... that doesn't mean it's not valuable evidence at getting to the truth.

Some hearsay is good evidence. Some is bad. When the topic of discussion is the content of the phone call, and that is hearsay by definition (it was said outside of a court and not under oath), then obviously the hearsay is good evidence.


Try harder, scandal defenders.