*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

What I can tell you is that economics is not boxing.

I'm really glad I wasn't being paid to teach you about logical analogies because you are the kind of person who would rather argue with facts than learn something.

Maybe it's like playing chess and sacrificing the bishop for a positional advantage.

So in your analogy, making a country 'pay economically' involves sacrificing something of lesser value in a zero sum game?

Do you get extra points at the end of the chess match for having more material? If so, that analogy would make more sense. It would still not support your argument, but at least it would hew to the standards of logic.

I can do invalid logical analogies.

fyp.