*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[TheSpoonald]

So, in your mind:

Fox says it and somebody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
Fox says it and nobody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and somebody on the right corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and nobody on the right corroborates it = FALSE

To sum up then, you believe everything Fox says, and only believe what CNN says if Fox also says it.

Yeah, that seems reasonable lol.

Do you believe Fox misquoted the lawyers? Do you think they read a legal pleading, and then completely misrepresented it in print? Is that what you're saying.

Seriously just fuck off. We were having a conversation about an interesting topic, and as usual you de-rail it when you run out of logic. Instead of continuing the conversation you just say "Nyah your sources suck, so everything you say is probably wrong"

Honestly dude, it's pathetic. I don't know if you're doing this on purpose (lame) or not (hopelessly dumb)

[Poopadoop]

Instead of continuing the conversation you just say "Nyah your sources suck, so everything you say is probably wrong"

If your assumptions are based on uncorrobated facts, then yes the rest of your argument is weakened. There's nothing illogical about pointing that out, whether you like it or not.

[TheSpoonald]

If your assumptions are based on uncorrobated facts, then yes the rest of your argument is weakened. There's nothing illogical about pointing that out, whether you like it or not.

Quotes directly from legal pleadings that are publicly available and can be fact-checked in five seconds are now "uncorroborated"

Seriously....just fuck off.

[Poopadoop]

Quotes directly from legal pleadings that are publicly available and can be fact-checked in five seconds are now "uncorroborated"

Seriously....just fuck off.

Then find the legal proceedings and show them to us. Do you seriously expect us to believe Fox is incapable of 'accidentally' inserting a 'fact' or two there?

Take the five seconds to corroborate your source.