|
|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Well, you can keep saying stupid, inconsequential things all day, but no one intelligent is going to agree with them.
Slow down there chuckles. Are you telling me that Mueller's scope was limited only to illegal activity? Is that what you believe?
The fact that you keep trying to paint me as having partisan interests is just folly.
I don't see where I've suggested you have partisan interests. I see your skepticism of Trump's victory on this to be folly. You don't have to like the guy to say that this report comes miles short of what Trump's opposition had hoped for.
How is someone who's so good at poker so bad at reading me?
Nah, it's a level. You're just bad at reading how good I am at reading you.
Not everyone... the media ratings-whores figured out that they could get a lot of ratings by throwing the word collusion around,
Google "Adam Schiff". If you're argument is that collusion was a diversion, it wasn't. I really don't know where you're getting that from.
All I care about is you said a stupid thing, and you're generally pretty smart. All I cared about was showing you that the thing you thought the MR said is not what you thought it said.
Does it or does it not say "We didn't even come close to satisfying the left's appetite for scandal"
It says that. Fucking read it.
So which is it? You here to engage in adult conversation about complex topics, or just spouting the same nonsense you heard from some mouth-frothing ratings whore as if you're educated about issues because you watched a TV person say politics things that you already thought were true?
You say "ratings whore" alot
|
Reply With Quote