Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
Wow you're really talking yourself in circles here.
Your inability to grasp straight-line logic doesn't mean it's circular.

First, you ackowledge that Mueller can't indict Trump
For the record, I acknowledged this way before it was cool.

but somehow that becomes: the fact that he didn't indict him means Trump wins.
Just because Mueller couldn't indict doesn't mean he couldn't disclose improper activity. Trump wins because Mueller found no evidence to corroborate any allegation of treasonous or collusive activity. No indictment just seems like a neato bonus.

Second, since Mueller provided all kinds of information on OOJ and not on treason, the information he gave on OOJ is meaningless somehow.
How are you drawing that conclusion from what I said? The information on OOJ is meaningless because it's not convincing enough to compel any meaningful action in response.

Then, collusion isn't a crime, so you question why didn't Mueller talk about a non-crime in his criminal investigation. Makes no sense at all.
Then entire report is about non-crime. You CNN'd yourself.