|
|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Anybody here find it worth questioning that the prominent anti-Trump opinion emerges from a media engine that stops at nothing to try to destroy Trump?
Let's try, one recent example.
Scott Pruitt was Trump's appointee for the position of the Head of EPA.
Originally Posted by wufwugy
I know literally zero about him.
Ok, let me fill you in.
Pruit was Oklahoma's AG for a number of years. During the time he held this position, he sued the EPA no less than 14 times block clean air and water safeguards from, you guess it, the EPA. Investigations showed that in every suit except one, at least one of Pruitt’s co-litigators contributed to Pruitt’s campaign or a political action committee affiliated with Pruitt – directly, or via an employee or member..
Trump appointed this man as the head of the EPA.
In your honest, unbiased opinion, without any other facts to consider, do you think it's a good idea to have made this person the head of the EPA?
After you gave that opinion, here are some more facts to consider, ofcourse in hindsight as he has already resigned
https://www.axios.com/go-deeper-the-...5dc32a1fd.html
http://fortune.com/2018/07/05/scott-...signs-scandal/
|
Reply With Quote