Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    Sure. Pedophrasty is an appeal to emotion. To not be a pedophrast, one must based argument on reason and evidence without using the emotional component that suspends reason.
    Sure, but any argument that includes the words 'children' and 'suffering' can be accused of pedophrasty, since there's no way to divorce those concepts from emotion. So the whole pedophrasty argument can just be a cop out excuse for letting children suffer.

    e.g.

    Critic: "It's cruel to make children suffer."

    Trumpist: "You're just a pedophrast."
    Last edited by Poopadoop; 06-23-2018 at 04:18 AM.
  2. #2
    Sure, but any argument that includes the words 'children' and 'suffering' can be accused of pedophrasty, since there's no way to divorce those concepts from emotion
    What the fuck does "pedophrasty" mean?
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    What the fuck does "pedophrasty" mean?
    I made it up based on pedophrast. The practice of using children to make an argument have an appeal to emotions when it wouldn't otherwise have a good grounding.

    e.g., "Immigration is bad. What if it was your child who got killed by an immigrant gang member?"
  4. #4
    oskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,019
    Location
    in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    What the fuck does "pedophrasty" mean?
    Apparently if you bring up children when talking about the separation and detainment of children, anything you say is invalid because it amounts to pedophrastry - apparently meaning something like using children to beg for money or use as an appeal to emotion, although I have not found any usage of the word outside of tabloid articles and twitter.

    So to reiterate: I take your child, you ask me to give it back. I call you a pedophrast for bringing up children, thus winning the argument and archiving moral highground.

    If this doesn't make sense to you, it's probably because you're not an idiot.
    Last edited by oskar; 06-23-2018 at 01:58 PM.
    The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Sure, but any argument that includes the words 'children' and 'suffering' can be accused of pedophrasty, since there's no way to divorce those concepts from emotion. So the whole pedophrasty argument can just be a cop out excuse for letting children suffer.

    e.g.

    Critic: "It's cruel to make children suffer."

    Trumpist: "You're just a pedophrast."
    Everybody agrees that children shouldn't suffer.

    Productive discussion will happen when it doesn't involve suspending reason by appealing to that emotion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •