Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by CoccoBill View Post
    You know what,
    But clearly you don't. You just blue-pilled yourself into believing it because you don't like Trump.

    but even Comey's allegations alone
    What allegations?

    Not investigating alleged links between a foreign power and a presidential campaign would be stupendously stupid without extremely solid proof that nothing definitely happened.
    So because Hillary alleges it....that means a multi-million dollar, 2 year inquiry has to be launched??

    Just like that?????

    You need to spend some time out of that tyrannical left wing echo chamber you live in.
    Last edited by BananaStand; 03-18-2018 at 10:12 AM.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    So then why aren't we investigating any Trump-Finland connections?
    Because no-one has alleged any. Because none of his campaign team had shady business dealings with Finland. Because no-one lied about talking to Finns. Because the president never conspired to make up a story about why they were talking to Finns.

    See how easy that is?
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Because no-one has alleged any. Because none of his campaign team had shady business dealings with Finland. Because no-one lied about talking to Finns. Because the president never conspired to make up a story about why they were talking to Finns.

    See how easy that is?
    Yeah, I missed the word "alleged". I ninja-edited it. But not fast enough

    The question now is....why are allegations enough?
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Yeah, I missed the word "alleged". I ninja-edited it. But not fast enough

    The question now is....why are allegations enough?
    Because typically (and in this case) they are based on suspicions which are founded in something tangible but not conclusive. That's why you investigate allegations to see if they are true.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Because typically (and in this case) they are based on suspicions which are founded in something tangible but not conclusive. That's why you investigate allegations to see if they are true.
    Shouldn't we first investigate the credibility of the person making the allegations. If they have an obvious reason to have a heavily biased perceptions of events....are their allegations credible??

    Imagine if I accused you of having six heads, is your willingness to investigate influenced by the fact that you just saw me take LSD?
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Shouldn't we first investigate the credibility of the person making the allegations. If they have an obvious reason to have a heavily biased perceptions of events....are their allegations credible??
    When the former head of the FBI swears under oath about the president asking him to let his buddy (Flynn) off the hook, then I think no matter what you think of either Comey or Trump you should investigate it, yes.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    When the former head of the FBI swears under oath about the president asking him to let his buddy (Flynn) off the hook, then I think no matter what you think of either Comey or Trump you should investigate it, yes.
    That's just a legal magic trick. They can't get an obstruction charge without proving intent. And since intent can't be proven...that should be the end of the investigation. Instead, people like you have blue-pilled themselves to try and prove intent by showing that the Russia stuff is true.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post

    Imagine if I accused you of having six heads, is your willingness to investigate influenced by the fact that you just saw me take LSD?
    Not even close to being a valid argument, since no-one witnessed Comey take LSD prior to his meeting with Trump and there's no reason to think therefore that he hallucinated the alleged words that Trump allegedly said to him.
  9. #9
    CoccoBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,523
    Location
    Finding my game
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    But clearly you don't. You just blue-pilled yourself into believing it because you don't like Trump.
    Cute. I just said I don't "believe" them, I just think there's enough to warrant an investigation. You on the other hand have decided to believe without a doubt they're false, without any tangible proof.

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    What allegations?
    You know what allegations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_..._investigation

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    So because Hillary alleges it....that means a multi-million dollar, 2 year inquiry has to be launched??

    Just like that?????

    You need to spend some time out of that tyrannical left wing echo chamber you live in.
    I said nothing about Hillary alleging anything.

    It is sorta fun to watch you squirm though.
    Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by CoccoBill View Post
    I said nothing about Hillary alleging anything.

    It is sorta fun to watch you squirm though.
    Lol ya I don't know where Hillary fits in all this unless banana thinks she's a shape-shifter who assumed Comey's form for the express purpose of making the allegations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •