*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

Bullshit.

Oskar clearly stated that he does not believe teachers should be tasked with preventing or stopping crimes. His phrasing clearly demonstrated that he think the idea crosses beyond ill-advised into the realm of comical. If that's in dispute, then you just don't get English.

He then went on to say that an alternative solution would be to treat social disorders with enhanced healthcare programs. If that's in dispute then you just don't get english.

So...statement 1: Teachers acting as cops is laughable

Statement 2: A better solution is for wizards to control people's minds and tell them not to do bad things.


I'm merely asking why he thinks that statement 2, in its original or paraphrased form, is not also laughable.

Lol you can't even get through one post without committing reductio ad bananum.

"Teachers acting as cops is laughable" is in line with Oskar's post.

After that you go off on some fantasy about mind control and magical beings, which is an attempt to rephrase his argument, such as it was, in a way so as to mock and belittle it.

Tell me, if you don't take the idea seriously, why are you asking him to defend it? I mean apart from the fact that he didn't say it, why should he indulge you?

You're obviously not open to hearing anyone else's thoughts and considering any merit they might possibly have. You're only apparent reason for being here is you're bored at work and think calling everyone who disagrees with you an idiot (or whose words you can twist into something absurd they didn't say) is a form of entertainment.

Fuck your life must be sad if this is the best thing you can find to do with your time.

[OngBonga]

The mockery, it's purely tone, it's purely a difference in debating styles. I hate it when people go "you're being mean" and use that as an excuse to sidestep the debate in question and even attempt to grab moral high ground.

Stop being so fucking sensetive. It's just words, you know what he means. The idea a shrink can do more to stop school shootings than an armed teacher is laughable, and warrants challenging.

[Poopadoop]

The mockery, it's purely tone, it's purely a difference in debating styles. I hate it when people go "you're being mean" and use that as an excuse to sidestep the debate in question and even attempt to grab moral high ground.

If it were only mockery, that's one thing. I do it myself. But I generally have a point to make other than 'if I change what you said to X, I can argue against it being true.' Wtf is the use of that?

The idea a shrink can do more to stop school shootings than an armed teacher is laughable, and warrants challenging.

See how easy it is to say that without being obnoxious about it?

Why are defending his right to be obnoxious but complaining when someone's obnoxious to him in return? Are you his mum?

[OngBonga]

The problem isn't you being obnoxious back, it's deflecting from the argument to bicker about how mean he is.

[Poopadoop]

The problem isn't you being obnoxious back, it's deflecting from the argument to bicker about how mean he is.

Well i'm going to keep pointing out his reductio ad bananums and other logical fallacies until he does something about it. Maybe have a word with him if you don't like it.