|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
I never said there would be fewer shootings; I said they would target different places. Maybe there'd be more deaths, like in LV.
I know you didn't say that; it is instead implied by your premise.
If concealed carry in schools incentivizes shooters to not shoot up schools, it means the probable outcome is fewer shootings (and fewer deaths). This is because the current selection of schools includes the greatest net benefit to the shooter. If the shooter is deterred from that, it means he either doesn't go shooting (if he's on the margin) or he goes shooting in a place where he is more likely to get fewer kills.
The net effect of your premise (which is a correct premise) is fewer mass shootings and fewer associated deaths.
|
Reply With Quote