|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
It seems USA goes one way or the other...
1. less guns,
2. more guns, but give them to the right people.
I don't think option 1 is all that logical. Who gives up their guns? Not the people likely to use them for shooting kids. Less guns means less for law abiding citizens. You're disarming the wrong people.
1. is pretty much undoable at this point, even some redneck nightmare mass government confiscations would take years and only scratch the surface. Finland is sort of in the same situation, due to them russians and hunting being a popular activity Finland has one of the highest per capita gun numbers in the EU. And guess what, we're also pretty much at the top for gun related violence.
|
Reply With Quote