The only thing that's actually "known", is that Trump thoroughly evaluated all options and chose the best option after considering all available information and advice. End of story.
You really have ZERO credible information as to why Trump explored that option, what his actual intentions were, or whether or not his mind actually had to be "changed". For all we know, he's just super-thorough, and wanted to look at every possible angle. Maybe he's not a leader who accepts scoffs as answers. Maybe he just likes to challenge advice that gets blurted out within 2 milliseconds. Maybe he had no intention of firing Meuller, he just wanted to challenge his advisers to justify the decision with facts and logic rather than "optics", especially when he knows that those optics are dictated by a media who hates him. Those all sounds like habits of someone who has enjoyed monumental business success.
You can infer a lack of judgement, or a Nixonian retaliation if you like, but there is nothing supporting that except third hand accounts filtered through the NY Times.
I'm not playing this game with you Poop where everything Fox Reports is bullshit, but everything the NY Times says is gospel. If that's how your brain works, there's really no point in debating you because you're incapable of independent thought.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by wufwugy
