|
|
 Originally Posted by boost
So, like, filter the swamp?
Heh. Word has been passed down that ending the "drain the swamp" rhetoric was Mitch McConnell's required compromise for Trump to make for them to even begin to work together. But yeah, the way to drain the swamp is with a filter, some of the stuff can stay, or more like some of the stuff will stay given the constraints.
Seriously though, yeah, you may be right, but I think that misses the point. If the book is not "complete fantasy", the reaction, especially with regards to Bannon, makes no sense.
Okay, I see. I think this is perfectly logical. And a reason I think most don't see it this way is because of compartmentalization. Somebody who sides with Trump can easily just say, "the book is false and Trump is using this as an opportunity to take out Bannon, not basing the Bannon take-out on the claims of the book."
|
Reply With Quote