|
 Originally Posted by CoccoBill
Combining the trial and error process with predetermined (but dynamic, that is, the performance of which are regularly measured and adjusted when necessary) rules for known errors would give the best of both worlds.
Do the predetermined rules have unintended consequences?
To me it's just not sufficient, that issues that have been around for hundreds of years under the influence of market forces without having been fixed, might be fixed at some point in the future.
I wouldn't mind discussing a specific issue you have in mind.
|