|
|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Sure. Pedophrasty is an appeal to emotion. To not be a pedophrast, one must based argument on reason and evidence without using the emotional component that suspends reason.
Sure, but any argument that includes the words 'children' and 'suffering' can be accused of pedophrasty, since there's no way to divorce those concepts from emotion. So the whole pedophrasty argument can just be a cop out excuse for letting children suffer.
e.g.
Critic: "It's cruel to make children suffer."
Trumpist: "You're just a pedophrast."
|
Reply With Quote