|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Views about nationalism are a good example of the play between liberalism and conservatism, namely how the liberal view thinks it's making things better yet it might be doing the complete opposite. Here's how: a diverse enough population loses its diversity and its fitness, and then dies off. I recall Nassim Taleb discussing the math of this. It's like how if you have a population that breeds together enough, genes lose the diversity that provide for fitness. Instead, what leads to fit genes is when there are subgroups that mostly breed amongst themselves and somewhat mix with other subgroups. This allows diversity of genes to maintain.
The same logic and statistical nature exists for just about every aspect of human civilization. Ideas, policies, practices -- regardless of scale.
That's a big yikes for me dawg. This sounds like the white nationalist nonsense you hear when they try to justify an ethnostate. If you look at actual data it points to the polar opposite. I wouldn't go around spreading this nonsense unless you have some really convincing data to back this up.
|