*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[CoccoBill]

I would think that when people willingly (I'd assume) go to all-black schools, that should be their right. If the government does it for them, without an opt-out option, that's different. Kinda like the difference between consensual sex and rape.

[OngBonga]

I would think that when people willingly (I'd assume) go to all-black schools, that should be their right. If the government does it for them, without an opt-out option, that's different. Kinda like the difference between consensual sex and rape.

How about all-white schools? Is it ok to have a school where black people are not allowed?

[CoccoBill]

How about all-white schools? Is it ok to have a school where black people are not allowed?

I can't think of a valid reason to have one no. Although, based on what I read, the US all-black schools aren't all-black, just majority black. As in, schools that were historically all-black.

[OngBonga]

I can't think of a valid reason to have one no. Although, based on what I read, the US all-black schools aren't all-black, just majority black. As in, schools that were historically all-black.

Majority black is fine. But that isn't racial segregation. If we find ourselves in a situation where white people are not allowed, that is racial segregation and is not something I can support, and neither should any of you guys because it's clearly racist. It discriminates against white people, just as an all-white school would discriminate against black people. Both are unacceptable.

If a school is all-black simply because the local population is all black, that's not by design, that's just demographics.

[Poopadoop]

How about all-white schools? Is it ok to have a school where black people are not allowed?

Do you know why the all-black schools got started?

[OngBonga]

Do you know why the all-black schools got started?

It makes no difference. It's still racial segregation.

[Poopadoop]

It makes no difference. It's still racial segregation.

See it kind of does make a difference. And I'm sure you know why they got started. So you're snowflake response to their existence is pretty funny.

[OngBonga]

See it kind of does make a difference. And I'm sure you know why they got started. So you're snowflake response to their existence is pretty funny.

lol "snowflake". I love how the word has been hijacked. Next you'll be calling me "woke".

Why don't you educate me? I can take a good guess why they got started, but I'll allow you to school me.

[Poopadoop]

So what would actually convince you that the UK police behave in a racist way? Would it have to be written into their code of ethics to be racist? 'Cause obviously their behaviour alone is not compelling evidence in your eyes.

[OngBonga]

So what would actually convince you that the UK police behave in a racist way? Would it have to be written into their code of ethics to be racist? 'Cause obviously their behaviour alone is not compelling evidence in your eyes.

We have an independent regulator here. I would believe racism is a problem in the UK police if that regulator were regularly charging cops with racism. If that were happening, it would be all over the news.

So once again it reiterate... for the police to be racist, so too is the supposedly independent regulator.

[Poopadoop]

So once again it reiterate... for the police to be racist, so too is the supposedly independent regulator.

yeah because independent police regulators always side with the public. Just look at any country.