*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[wufwugy]

By passing tax cuts, laws and regulations which benefit quite specifically the elites and elitists

Why do you have that idea?

[Jack Sawyer]

Why do you have that idea?

LOL wuf

Tax cuts: "
Why the GOP Tax Cut Will Make Wealth Inequality So Much Worse

The richest 1 percent now own 40 percent of the country's wealth. Under this bill, they’d own more.
"

https://www.theatlantic.com/business...alilty/548726/

Net neutrality:

"Everyone's missing the other part of the net neutrality debate — Big Tech is poised to become even more powerful"

http://www.businessinsider.com/fccs-...panies-2017-12

LOL Environment:

"Trump to repeal Obama fracking rule"

Big Oil is super happy of course!

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-env...-fracking-rule

I can continue, but it will literally not do anything to your bubble, so I won't bother



Mmmmm, I wonder why I have that idea

[wufwugy]

LOL wuf

Tax cuts: "
Why the GOP Tax Cut Will Make Wealth Inequality So Much Worse

The richest 1 percent now own 40 percent of the country's wealth. Under this bill, they’d own more.
"

https://www.theatlantic.com/business...alilty/548726/

Net neutrality:

"Everyone's missing the other part of the net neutrality debate — Big Tech is poised to become even more powerful"

http://www.businessinsider.com/fccs-...panies-2017-12

LOL Environment:

"Trump to repeal Obama fracking rule"

Big Oil is super happy of course!

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-env...-fracking-rule

I can continue, but it will literally not do anything to your bubble, so I won't bother



Mmmmm, I wonder why I have that idea

What do people with expertise on the topics think?

[Jack Sawyer]

What do people with expertise on the topics think?

Those are comments by people with expertise on the topic(s), apparently much more expertise than your beloved dear leader

[wufwugy]

Those are comments by people with expertise on the topic(s), apparently much more expertise than your beloved dear leader

Ah, I see.

[Jack Sawyer]

Ah, I see.

Good of you that you do

[BananaStand]

Why do you have that idea?

Cause like everyone on the left, he can't shake the absurd notion that the government is better at spending money on the economy than investors.

Practically 100% of history has proven this to be unconditionally wrong. It's just SOOOOO easy for left wing politicians to fool poor people by framing tax relief as crony capitalism. People who are too dumb, or too lazy, or too underpriveleged to know the history, or think about economics on any intelligent level swallow that hook line and sinker.

"that guy's already got so much, I got nothing, and the government gave him more....WTF????"

Even a bottom-level thought process would come to the realization that the money returned via tax cuts doesn't really leave the economy. It gets re-invested in the economy and the economy grows. The alternative, higher taxes, results in a stagnant economy propped up by government redistribution of wealth along the very bottom of the economy.

If 20% more of your friends and neighbors have jobs, not just job, but GOOD jobs that allow them security and freedom.......do you really care if the guy employing them has a bigger boat?

I can't believe there really people in this world, namely The Democratic Party, who would rather have those 20% of people unemployed, dependent on a government check, just to enforce some poetic justice by taxing the bejeezus out of some greedy fat cat??

It's pretty obvious to see that dependency = votes, and that's why they do it. I just can't believe 60+ million voting Americans are stupid enough to not see this.

[wufwugy]

If 20% more of your friends and neighbors have jobs, not just job, but GOOD jobs that allow them security and freedom.......do you really care if the guy employing them has a bigger boat?

The kicker is that it can be said that he employs them BECAUSE he has a bigger boat.*

Take away the profit signal and you take away growth in the quantity and quality of goods. Taught in ECON 101 and demonstrated by history's communist regimes.


*More like the expectation of getting a bigger boat by taking on the risk of employing them for the task at hand.

[Jack Sawyer]

I can't believe there really people in this world, namely The Democratic Party, who would rather have those 20% of people unemployed, dependent on a government check, just to enforce some poetic justice by taxing the bejeezus out of some greedy fat cat??

It's pretty obvious to see that dependency = votes, and that's why they do it. I just can't believe 60+ million voting Americans are stupid enough to not see this.

Oh the Democratic Party in the US is just Republican Light. And who would vote for Republican Light when they can just vote for Republicans? There is no real choice in US politics. And that is baffling to me, you think you have choice but you are all just along for the ride, and it doesn't matter what you want, money will always be prioritized over you

All of it is just a sad joke

[spoonitnow]

Why do you have that idea?

Because dipshit crybaby liberals would rather have half of a 5-pound bag of gold than 10 percent of a 1000-pound bag of gold.

They want a bigger piece of a smaller pie.

They do not understand economics, and they do not understand basic fucking math.

They cannot be reasoned with because they are not reasonable.

[wufwugy]

would rather have half of a 5-pound bag of gold than 10 percent of a 1000-pound bag of gold.

A phenomenon of humankind, indeed.