*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

This is what intelligent discourse looks like, btw. No name-calling, changing the topic, or talking garbage out of your ass. If anyone is interested in that here, I'm all for it.

[TheSpoonald]

This is what intelligent discourse looks like, btw.

I'm four minutes in and no it's not intelligent discourse. It's three people getting about 4 minutes a piece to be dumb. they're paid to be there and shut up while the other one is talking. It's not a debate. It's a show.

And that bearded guy is a retard. He starts off by talking about how Don Jr was welcoming Russian delegates offering dirt on Hillary. Basically the same whine-storm that poop has been making for likely over a year now. It's a completely disingenuous and fraudulent argument

If it's not a crime for Hillary to hire someone with Russian contacts, and buy dirt on Trump from the Russians....then it's CERTAINLY not a crime for Don Jr to accept similar dirt for free.

If it's improper or suspicious for Don Jr to even entertain that solicitation, then it is also improper or suspicious to lend any credibility to anything in Steele's dossier.

So the selective outrage is just grotesque in this case.

[Poopadoop]

shut up while the other one is talking.

Lol I know it's outrageous how respectful they are of each other.

And that bearded guy is a retard. He starts off by talking about how Don Jr was welcoming Russian delegates offering dirt on Hillary.

The other guy responds that Hillary did the same thing with the Steele dossier. But I guess because he didn't call the other guy a douchebag it's not a fair argument.

[TheSpoonald]

The other guy responds that Hillary did the same thing with the Steele dossier.

That should be the end of the show then. Either they are both colluding with Russians, or neither of them are. Make up your mind.

There's actually no room for honest disagreement on this subject.

Accepting oppo research from a foreign government is a bad idea because it could be bad information, it could have unintended consequences, and you can't be sure of the foreign government's true motives. Fine. I agree with that.

Hillary accepted oppo reasearch from a foreign government, and all of the worst fears were realized. The Russians were successful in undermining our government's effectiveness for two years simply by making up stories to give to Steele.

And Trump is the bad guy here....why?

[Poopadoop]

That should be the end of the show then. Either they are both colluding with Russians, or neither of them are. Make up your mind.

There's actually no room for honest disagreement on this subject.

Accepting oppo research from a foreign government is a bad idea because it could be bad information, it could have unintended consequences, and you can't be sure of the foreign government's true motives. Fine. I agree with that.

Hillary accepted oppo reasearch from a foreign government, and all of the worst fears were realized. The Russians were successful in undermining our government's effectiveness for two years simply by making up stories to give to Steele.

And Trump is the bad guy here....why?

Ted Bundy killed a bunch of people. Why is anyone upset that Charles Manson killed people? Why is he a bad guy?

[TheSpoonald]

Ted Bundy killed a bunch of people. Why is anyone upset that Charles Manson killed people? Why is he a bad guy?

Was one victimized by an illegal witch hunt that undermined the policy agenda for the entire country while the other was allowed to skate???

That's a shit analogy.

[Poopadoop]

Was one victimized by an illegal witch hunt that undermined the policy agenda for the entire country while the other was allowed to skate???

That's a shit analogy.

You can't have it both ways. Either they're both guilty or they're both not. One doesn't get a 'witch hunt' while the other 'skates'. At most, one gets investigated because he won and is now POTUS and the other doesn't get investigated because she lost and is now living in the woods keeping her mouth shut.

[Poopadoop]

Also there's the question of obstruction of justice. Hillary hasn't been caught trying to fire people to keep them from investigating her wrondoings, Trump has been blatant about it.

[TheSpoonald]

Also there's the question of obstruction of justice. Hillary hasn't been caught trying to fire people to keep them from investigating her wrondoings, Trump has been blatant about it.

No, she just threatened rape victims into silence.

And Trump never fired anybody in order to prevent or encumber any investigation. That's an imagined talking point. We know this because no firing ever resulted in any diminished effectiveness or any investigation. We also know that Trump could have fired people to stop the investigation (namely Mueller), and did not do so.

[Poopadoop]

No, she just threatened rape victims into silence.

Has this been proven? 'Cause it sounds like a crime to me.

And Trump never fired anybody in order to prevent or encumber any investigation. That's an imagined talking point.

He fired Comey, tried to fire Mueller, tried to order Sessions to make a statement and change the nature of the investigation. That's all real.

[TheSpoonald]

Dems: We know Trump colluded with the Russians

Sane people: How do you know?

Dems: The russians offered opposition research

Sane people: How do you know?

Dems: The russians told us in this opposition research we just bought.

Sane people: [heads explode]