|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Tape sounds pretty ambiguous to me. Probably someone is running it through a voice analyzer right now.
Do they not teach context clues where you live or what?
Originally Posted by Poopadoop
The funny part is either way it makes no sense. If he say "I do" that's obviously a surprise. And if he said "I would" he never finished the thought by saying, e.g., "...if we ever met."
So basically Trump's complaint is that his nonsense was mistaken for slightly different nonsense.
Also the reporter's follow-up question makes it clear he thought Trump said "I do" and Trump either never caught on to that or didn't feel it was worth clarifying what he'd actually said. He just rambled on about conversations he may or may not have had and he wasn't going to talk about.
WSJ posted fake news and got their souls crushed on it. It's not the first time this has happened with a major media outlet. Or the second. Or the third. Or the 20th.
Originally Posted by Poopadoop
I hope they publish more Trump tapes. I love how he takes 15 seconds to speak a 5 second sentence, and adds in superfluous information like "Abe...of Japan" , and "Un...of North Korea" as if people wouldn't otherwise know who he's talking about. Not that senility is funny, but it's funny how his supporters will keep denying it no matter how much evidence there is.
It's not senility; he's spoken like that for decades, and it's intentional.
On the X of Y topic, if he didn't specify, then fuck knows how the media would try to spin his words to mean other people than who he's talking about.
|
Reply With Quote