cost of doing nothing x probability that gw is real > cost of doing something x probability that it's fake
edit: of course for any doomsday scenario that has a non-zero chance of occuring, the left side will be greater than the right side regardless. To invalidate my argument, just replace global warming with "hell" (maybe them jeebus nuts aren't so nutty after all!).
(in other words, ignore this post.)


Reply With Quote