Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Official CUCKposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 654

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    No, it's not fair. Not even close. I've posted on here several times about wanting to punch Poopadoop in the face. Does that mean I shouldn't be allowed to have knuckles??
    No, it means you're a complaint away from getting a warning and/or temp ban on FTR.
    If the people to whom you are directing your vitriolic, non-sequitur, not-even-really-veiled threats decide they're sick of you, then I'm on their side.

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Every single one of those things is protected by the first amendment of the constitution.
    SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that using "fighting words" is equivalent to fighting.
    I.e. using language which is intended to incite a fight is the same as throwing the first punch.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that using "fighting words" is equivalent to fighting.
    I.e. using language which is intended to incite a fight is the same as throwing the first punch.
    There most definitely has to be more to this. Like the "fighting words" have to have some kind of credibility.

    If it were as simple as you're making it sound, why isn't Madonna in jail for threatening to blow up the White House?
  3. #3
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    There most definitely has to be more to this. Like the "fighting words" have to have some kind of credibility.

    If it were as simple as you're making it sound, why isn't Madonna in jail for threatening to blow up the White House?
    I spent hours digging up this link for you, so I understand why it was so hard for you to figure this out on your own.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighti...#United_States
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    I spent hours digging up this link for you, so I understand why it was so hard for you to figure this out on your own.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighti...#United_States
    I got three sentences in and can already see this is irrelevant.

    Saying "I wanna shoot a school someday" is not an "immediate breach of the peace"


    Also you still haven't answered my question....if we're gonna lock up this 21 year old for boasting online, why is Madonna a free woman??
  5. #5
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    I got three sentences in and can already see this is irrelevant.

    Saying "I wanna shoot a school someday" is not an "immediate breach of the peace"


    Also you still haven't answered my question....if we're gonna lock up this 21 year old for boasting online, why is Madonna a free woman??
    lol.

    You're adorable, you know.

    The answer to your question is in the reading, but I understand that you needed a lie-down after 3 long sentences.
    Maybe take a nap and come back at it again later. I have faith in you, tiger.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    lol.

    You're adorable, you know.

    The answer to your question is in the reading, but I understand that you needed a lie-down after 3 long sentences.
    Maybe take a nap and come back at it again later. I have faith in you, tiger.
    Dude, the author of the piece even admitted that the law isn't on her side.
  7. #7
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Dude, the author of the piece even admitted that the law isn't on her side.
    You mean the article which I haven't expressed a single thought on, don't you?
    You think I've made some commentary on the stupid topic you brought up and not the stupid things you've said which I've quoted, don't you?

    I get that you can't follow a thread of thought for more than a post or two though, since most people are so rude that they use more than 3 sentences to make a point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •