My favorite cabal of cucks, The American Psychological Association, strikes again
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/20/o...-shooters.html
Basically a 21 year old buys a gun and posts ominous shit online. His parents call the cops. The cops call the shrink.
What the shrink says....
What the shrink does.....What options did I have? It was clear to me that he did not have a psychiatric illness that would justify an involuntary hospitalization
A law abiding citizen was deprived of his freedom for two days, without due process. And why.....???I ended up admitting this patient,
So the shrink could cover her own ass
And further deprive a law abiding man of his rights without due processThe only advantage of this version of events would be that the order to release the man who might be the next mass shooter would not be signed with my pen.
She admits that the first reason is entirely selfish and is nowhere near her assigned scope of work. And she either doesn't know, or doesn't care, that the second is an affront to the Constitution. And SHE COMMITS THE GUY ANYWAY!!!The one concrete benefit of officially committing him would be that he could be prohibited from buying a gun from any federally licensed retailer.



Reply With Quote