*** The Official CUCKposting thread ***

[wufwugy]

I can't think of a regular here that I think has a lower IQ than me.

I never took a test but I estimate I'm probably around 110 at best.

Nowhere near Savy's proven genius level based on that one thing he solved that one time.

[Poopadoop]

I can't think of a regular here that I think has a lower IQ than me.

I never took a test but I estimate I'm probably around 110 at best.

Nowhere near Savy's proven genius level based on that one thing he solved that one time.

lolz, does anyone else remember how pissed he got when it was pointed out that one test doth not a genius maketh?

[Savy]

Nowhere near Savy's proven genius level based on that one thing he solved that one time.

That no one else could do.

lolz, does anyone else remember how pissed he got when it was pointed out that one test doth not a genius maketh?

I don't, can you please reference better in the future when making sweeping statements.

[wufwugy]

I've never seen Savy and Ed Witten in the same room. Just sayin'.

[Savy]

I've never seen Savy and Ed Witten in the same room. Just sayin'.

Accomplishing things is a bit too try hard imo. I imagine my IQ is only 107ish so even you're probably more intelligent than me.

[wufwugy]

Accomplishing things is a bit too try hard imo. I imagine my IQ is only 107ish so even you're probably more intelligent than me.

Well then I'm vastly underestimating what 110 means. There's no way I have a higher IQ than you. I don't even look at puzzles much less solve them. Only some of my talents excel when it comes to numbers and shapes and that other IQ stuff.

[Poopadoop]

I think everyone is missing the point that the validity of an argument is independent of the IQ of the person making it. If Einstein had looked outside on a rainy day and said 'it's sunny today', then accepting that statement would still be retarded, even though it came from Einstein.

[Savy]

Well then I'm vastly underestimating what 110 means. There's no way I have a higher IQ than you. I don't even look at puzzles much less solve them. Only some of my talents excel when it comes to numbers and shapes and that other IQ stuff.

the average person from hong kong and singapore apparently has an iq of 108 (according to some random website on google).

100 is the average in the uk
98 is the average in the us

lol

I think everyone is missing the point that the validity of an argument is independent of the IQ of the person making it. If Einstein had looked outside on a rainy day and said 'it's sunny today', then accepting that statement would still be retarded, even though it came from Einstein.

No one is missing the point, and especially aren't disagreeing with you, we're just deciding to chat shit about a similar but different topic.

[Poopadoop]

the average person from hong kong and singapore apparently has an iq of 108 (according to some random website on google).

100 is the average in the uk
98 is the average in the us

Change that to the average in London or New York and I'm guessing the numbers are much more comparable with Singapore. Smart people go to the cities, less smart ones stay on the farm.

[wufwugy]

the average person from hong kong and singapore apparently has an iq of 108 (according to some random website on google).

That's interesting and I wonder if it's related to how the education focuses on like test-taking skill so much.

Because over there, especially in Hong Kong, all the youth does is study for tests. It's not even studying to learn or to problem-solve but to get answers correct on tests.

[Poopadoop]

I don't

Well there's a surprise. That argument went on for pages IIRC.