I care a lot, the problem I had is I thought the report was very poorly thought out.
1. Why would you name names? If you want the emphasis to be on the message you have to the MLB, your shooting yourself in the foot to name big names.
2. Some of the players implicated are clearly put on the same pedastol as others because they are "in the report," EVEN THOUGH guys like Brian Roberts have absolutely no proof that they did HGH or steroids. I mean some of the ones I read were ridiculous. Your implicating Brian Roberts because he was simply introduced to someone who sold steroids? So if im friends with a drug dealer does that mean i do drugs? No.
3. I don't think Mitchell's motivations were in the right place, I think he was more into the publicity of the whole thing than actually doing anything. Why did we have a senator lead the investigation anyways? They should've had a supreme court justice or something like that.

Anyways, I was very dissatisfied with it.