Yeah, at the very least we're definitely in the same chapter.

I think the inability to make a meaningful falsifiable statement regarding morality is due to the shortcomings of our language(s). We (have come to?) define morality in such a spongy vague way, and that's probably due to religions attempting to safeguard their modes of thought by way of a unsaid mutually agreed upon pact to handle either other's modes of thought with kiddie gloves. If contradictory assertions are equally true, nothing is true, the Pope can't be a liar.