I'm pretty sure we're on the same page.

I'm not saying science will never be able to deal with morality.

I'm saying that scientific method can be applied to literally everything. Once you know the steps of scientific method, you can readily observe any toddler going through the process.

Now hearken back to my most recent post. It's not enough to trust ourselves. We have to engage in a conversation where we compare all of our observations and seek to create falsifiable statements which we cannot falsify by experiment, even though we try to, really hard.

The problem with morality is that no one has yet been able to formulate a falsifiable statement that is not falsified by some experiment.

If/when this can be accomplished, then science will be able to proceed past the introductory steps of trying to find a fist principle upon which a greater model may congeal.