I think the points boost is making, as well as a lot of the points made by others, intentionally or unintentionally, highlight the need for a utilitarian approach. For example, very few people who support abortions can reasonably feel 100% confident in themselves, but that doesn't mean the other option is they're wrong.

Morals will always get you in trouble. Why? Because they assume idealism. But reality doesn't give a fuck about idealism. What is murder to us is best summed up in utility. If we consider it through morals, we'll simply hit a whole bunch of logical problems and people will pick sides and fight it out. Imposing morality lets heuristics or inconsistent logic or emotions rule. At least with a utilitarian approach we can get the best of what reality allows. Keep in mind that the "abortion debate" is a product of the moralistic worldview assumed by American Christianity, more specifically, the modern xtian movement known as the Moral Majority

If it wasn't for believers of superstition, the idea that "abortion is murder" wouldn't even exist