So awhile ago i get a message on facebook from a reporter doing a story on UIGEA and young poker players. She's interested if I am one since i was a member of a UIGEA group. I tell her my poker life, and she asks me if I would like to do an interview. So on Wednesday, she's going to come to my apartment and interview me on camera!!!

I'm super excited, but I also realize this is a big responsibility for me to not sound stupid, and make intelligent points. This is what she said the interview would be about.

"I am interviewing young people, on camera, about their online gambling habits and why/why not they think they should be able to continue gambling online."

I'm mostly interested on help for the second point. I mean pretty much I was going to bring up these points.
1. We live in a free country: We live in a place where people feel as their liberties should not be taken away.

I feel like at this point many points could be brought up. She could say "Well if people think something is obviously morally wrong like gambling should be banned because it's dangers are so apparent." In which i'd like to bring up some sort of counter example, such as vegetarians banning meat or what not, but a much better example.
This leads to:
2. The legislation is hypocritical: People who support the bill for moral reasons need to look at the facts. This bill does not ban gambling, in fact it specifically doesn't ban horse racing and lottery. Casino's are still around. They clearly don't care to ban gambling, but rather ban forms that don't benefit them. I remember Barney Frank saying he thought the reason for the legislation is because it didn't contribute to the GDP.

Please help me out guys, it could really help.

(Oh Admins, btw I plan on wearing my FTR t-shirt during the interview!)

{WildBob Edit: Here's the link http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/....aspx?id=71799 }